← Back to inventory
1. Work Comp Portal Implementation*
OrthoNebraska · Sprint
Overview
- Department
- PFS - 7600
- Strategic Imperative
- Operational Excellence & Quality
- Sponsor / Owner
- Tara Wisdom
- Project Manager
- Bill Citro
- Ideal Team
- Bill Citro, Kara Albright, Amy Evanich, Tiffany Gardner, Haley Martin, Kelly Mccann
- Preferred Sprint
- Sprint 1 (Jan 12 - Feb 20)
- Priority
- 1. Mission Critical
- Priority Payoff
- High Benefit / High Effort
- Core Process
- Scale
- Core Process Category
- (Core) Collect
- % Complete
- —
- Resources
- IT
Objective & KPI
- Objective
- Design and Implement a work comp portal for carrier and employer access, providing automated documentation needed to improve patient access to care and financial approval.
- Goal / Output
- Complete implementation of WC Portal
- KPI
- cost to collect; NRC scores, net write off %
- Notes
- Quote provided by Health Assist. Outcome of 2025 Sprint.
Financial Impact
- 2026 Op. (Exp.)
- —
- 2026 Op. (Act.)
- —
- 2026 Cap. (Exp.)
- $105,000
- 2026 Cap. (Act.)
- —
- 2027 Op. (Exp.)
- —
- 2027 Cap. (Exp.)
- —
- Capital Priority
- 1
- Confidence
- —
Dependencies
Depends on (upstream)
No prerequisites recorded.
Blocks / feeds (downstream)
Nothing waiting on this project.
Status History (3)
| Period | Scope | Schedule | Budget | Progress | Root Cause | Notes | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2026(edited) | Green | Red | Red | 5% | IT Resource Constraint | • NOTES: Capital approved, contract has not been signed - Internal IT has put a hold on the contract. 3rd party rsik assessment. This is a Cerner preffered vendor but there is concern that they are not a US based company. - Project Kicked off. - Meetings with Vendor starting. - Launch by Q3 is ideal. - If this delays, there will be a negatinve impact to direct to employer. • PROJECT RISKS & RECOMMENDATIONS: A decision needs to be made on the next steps to move forward between IT and Operations. Total cost of ownership is greater than anticipated. Ann and Tom are putting together a total cost of ownership to determine if we want to move forward with this vendor and solution. • LEADERSHIP DISCUSSION NEEDED: (Yes / No) Yes | Edit |
| May 2026(edited) | Green | Red | Red | 5% | IT Resource | Capital approved, contract has not been signed - Internal IT has put a hold on the contract. 3rd party rsik assessment. This is a Cerner preffered vendor but there is concern that they are not a US based company. - Project Kicked off. - Meetings with Vendor starting. - Launch by Q3 is ideal. - If this delays, there will be a negatinve impact to direct to employer. | Edit |
| April 2026(edited) | Green | Red | Green | 5% | IT Resource | Contract and capital approved. - Internal IT has put a hold on the contract. 3rd party rsik assessment. This is a Cerner preffered vendor but there is concern that they are not a US based company. - Project Kicked off. - Meetings with Vendor starting. - Launch by Q3 is ideal. - If this delays, there will be a negatinve impact to direct to employer. | Edit |
Archive & Remove
Hides it from active views; fully reversible. Use this for canceled or on-hold work.